Matt JN Brown

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a complex symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) that manifests during walking as limited forward progression despite the intention to walk. It is unclear if lower limb motor blocks (LLMB) that occur independently from FOG are related to overground FOG and the effects of dopaminergic medications. Nineteen patients with PD were tested on two separate days in the dopaminergic medication "on" and "off" states. The patients completed a series of freezing-provoking tasks while videotaped. Raters assessed videos for FOG presence using Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale item 3.11 score greater than or equal to 1 and FOG severity using the standardized FOG score. Whilst seated in a virtual environment, patients and 20 healthy controls stepped in right-left sequence on foot pedals. Frequency and percent time in LLMB were assessed for accurate classification of FOG presence and correlation to the FOG score. Frequency and percent time spent in LLMB predicted the presence of FOG in both medication states. Percent time spent in LLMB correlated with FOG severity in both medication states. LLMB frequency predicted FOG severity in the "off" state only. LLMB during bilateral stepping in a virtual environment predicted the presence and severity of FOG in PD in both "on" and "off" medication states. These findings support the use of this non-walking paradigm to detect and assess FOG in PD patients unable or unsafe to walk.

The interconnection of the angular gyrus of right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and the left motor cortex (LM1) is essential for goal-directed hand movements. Previous work with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) showed that right PPC stimulation increases LM1 excitability but right PPC followed by left PPC-LM1 stimulation (LPPC-LM1) inhibits LM1 corticospinal output compared to LPPC-LM1 alone. It is not clear if right PPC-mediated inhibition of LPPC-LM1 is due to inhibition of left PPC or to combined effects of right and left PPC stimulation on LM1 excitability. We used paired-pulse TMS to study the extent to which combined right and left PPC stimulation, targeting the angular gyri, influences LM1 excitability. We tested 16 healthy subjects in five paired-pulsed TMS experiments using MRI-guided neuronavigation to target the angular gyri within PPC. We tested the effects of different right angular gyrus (RAG) and LM1 stimulation intensities on the influence of RAG on LM1 and on influence of left angular gyrus (LAG) on LM1 (LAG-LM1). We then tested the effects of RAG and LAG stimulation on LM1 short-interval intracortical facilitation(SICF), short-interval intracortical inhibition(SICI) and long-interval intracortical inhibition(LICI). The results revealed that RAG facilitated LM1, inhibited SICF and inhibited LAG-LM1. Combined RAG-LAG stimulation did not affect SICI but increased LICI. These experiments suggest that RAG-mediated inhibition of LAG-LM1 is related to inhibition of early I-wave activity and enhancement of GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition in LM1. The influence of RAG on LM1 likely involves ipsilateral connections from LAG to LM1 and heterotopic connections from RAG to LM1.

Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (ds-TMS) is a neurophysiological technique to measure functional connectivity between cortical areas. To date, no study has used ds-TMS to investigate short intra-hemispheric interactions between the somatosensory areas and primary motor cortex (M1). We examined somatosensory-M1 interactions in the left hemisphere in six experiments using ds-TMS. In Experiment 1 (n = 16), the effects of different conditioning stimulus (CS) intensities on somatosensory-M1 interactions were measured with 1 and 2.5 ms inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs). In Experiment 2 (n = 16), the time-course of somatosensoy-M1 interactions was studied using supra-threshold CS intensity at 6 different ISIs. In Experiment 3 (n = 16), the time-course of short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) and effects of different CS intensities on SICI were measured similar to Experiments 1 and 2. Experiment 4 (n = 13) examined the effects of active contraction on SICI and somatosensory-M1 inhibition. Experiments 5 and 6 (n = 10) examined the interactions between SAI with either 1 ms SICI or somatosensory-M1 inhibition. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed reduced MEP amplitudes when applying somatosensory CS 1 ms prior to M1 TS with 140 and 160% CS intensities. Experiment 3 demonstrated that SICI at 1 and 2.5 ms did not correlate with somatosensory-M1 inhibition. Experiment 4 found that SICI but not somatosensory-M1 inhibition was abolished with active contraction. The results of Experiments 5–6 showed SAI was disinhibited in presence of somatosensory-M1 while SAI was increased in presence of SICI. Collectively, the results support the notion that the somatosensory areas inhibit the ipsilateral M1 at very short latencies. •Supra-threshold left somatosensory stimulation inhibited MEP evoked from the ipsilateral M1 1 ms later.•SICI produced maximum inhibition at 1 and 2.5 ms ISIs across a variety of sub-threshold intensities.•The degree of somatosensory-M1 inhibition and SICI did not correlate.•Somatosensory-M1 inhibition represents a novel, fast inhibitory cortico-cortical circuit.

Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation to the primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can be used to probe functional connectivity between these regions. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of DLPFC stimulation on ipsilateral M1 excitability while participants were at rest and contracting the left- and right-hand first dorsal interosseous muscle. Twelve participants were tested in two separate sessions at varying inter-stimulus intervals (ISI: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, and 20 ms) at two different conditioning stimulus intensities (80% and 120% of resting motor threshold). No significant effect on ipsilateral M1 excitability was found when applying a conditioning stimulus over DLPFC at any specific inter-stimulus interval or intensity in either the left or right hemisphere. Our findings suggest neither causal inhibitory nor faciliatory influences of DLPFC on ipsilateral M1 activity while participants were at rest or when performing an isometric contraction in the target hand muscle.

Measurements of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), recorded using electroencephalography during different phases of movement, have been fundamental in understanding the neurophysiological changes related to motor control. SEP recordings have also been used to investigate adaptive plasticity changes in somatosensory processing related to active and observational motor learning tasks. Combining noninvasive brain stimulation with SEP recordings and intracranial SEP depth recordings, including recordings from deep brain stimulation electrodes, has been critical in identifying neural areas involved in specific temporal stages of somatosensory processing. Consequently, this fundamental information has furthered our understanding of the maladaptive plasticity changes related to pathophysiology of diseases characterized by abnormal movements, such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and functional movement disorders.
During movement (from movement preparation to execution) activity in the somatosensory system, as reflected in SEP recordings, upregulates or downregulates differentially, depending on task constraints (e.g., attention) and the limb used for the movement.
Analyses of SEPs revealed that adaptive and plastic changes to the somatosensory system can be seen in both active and observational motor learning tasks.
Short-term plasticity changes, induced by noninvasive brain stimulation over sensorimotor integration areas, as well as over more associative areas such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cause distinct SEP modulations.
Abnormal gating of SEPs, at rest and/or during movement, is representative of the pathophysiology of movement disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and functional movement disorders.