Abstract
The present study was designed to assess children’s memory and suggestibility in the context of ongoing child maltreatment investigations. One hundred eighty-nine 3–17-year-olds involved in evaluations of alleged maltreatment were interviewed with specific and misleading questions about an anogenital examination and clinical assessment. For the anogenital examination, children’s stress arousal was indexed both behaviorally and physiologically. For all children, individual-difference data were gathered on intellectual and short-term memory abilities, general psychopathology, and dissociative tendencies. Interviewers’ ratings were available for a subset of children concerning the amount of detail provided in abuse disclosures. Results indicated that general psychopathology, short-term memory, and intellectual ability predicted facets of children’s memory performance. Older compared to younger children evinced fewer memory errors and greater suggestibility resistance. Age was also significantly related to the amount of detail in children’s abuse disclosures. Neither dissociation nor stress arousal significantly predicted children’s memory. Implications for understanding maltreated children’s eyewitness memory are discussed.