Abstract
Due to the complex and underground nature of human trafficking, there is often a stark contrast between the understanding of individuals drafting and enforcing policy, and the reality of what victims actually face. This project applies a Constructivist lens to the issue of human trafficking and aims to examine how non-state actors like those belonging to Transnational Advocacy Networks play an important role in effectively bridging gaps in understanding and addressing the needs of victims. To support the case of Constructivism’s applicability to human trafficking, this project uses a combination of case studies that exhibit Constructivist tenets and first-hand information I obtained during my internship with Opening Doors’ Survivors of Human Trafficking program. Consistent with the nature of human trafficking, the case studies examined have human rights emphases, and include challenges facing international anti-trafficking efforts. My personal experience provides insight into local efforts of anti-trafficking activists. The literature and my experience during my internship demonstrate the value of utilizing Constructivist framework to approach human trafficking. On-going information sharing among non-state actors and those with enforcement power is key in developing and implementing effective anti-trafficking policy. However, a great deal of division exists among activists based on their interpretation of what approaches are best suited to prevent the problem and rehabilitate victims. This has resulted in an active albeit extremely fragmented anti-trafficking Transnational Advocacy Network.